The yield evaluation trials were conducted during turmeric growing seasons (summer). 2004 to 2010
comprising local selection cultivars of turmeric over two diverse conditions. both lower altitude (181
mas/) and mid hills (1480 mas/). to assess the high yielding cultivars of turmeric . .Joint regression
analysis model was used to determine stability parameters where in mean rhizome yield of the trails
was used as independent and individual genotype rhizome yield as dependent variables. The cultivar
CJ 9801 was found to be most ideal with greater mean rhizome yield than overall mean (27.83 mt '1'
0
),
statistically unit regression (b= 1.175) and lowest deviation from regression followed by CI 9804
which yielded higher and found to be above overa~e. stable and adapted to poor environments. The
cultivar Cl 0209 recorded top yield (34.05 mt · ') and more specifically adapted to favorable
environments (b=/.313).

The yield evaluation trials were conducted during turmeric growing seasons (summer). 2004 to 2010
comprising local selection cultivars of turmeric over two diverse conditions. both lower altitude (181
mas/) and mid hills (1480 mas/). to assess the high yielding cultivars of turmeric . .Joint regression
analysis model was used to determine stability parameters where in mean rhizome yield of the trails
was used as independent and individual genotype rhizome yield as dependent variables. The cultivar
CJ 9801 was found to be most ideal with greater mean rhizome yield than overall mean (27.83 mt '1'
0
),
statistically unit regression (b= 1.175) and lowest deviation from regression followed by CI 9804
which yielded higher and found to be above overa~e. stable and adapted to poor environments. The
cultivar Cl 0209 recorded top yield (34.05 mt · ') and more specifically adapted to favorable
environments (b=/.313).