The present investigation was undertaken on 240 day-old broiler chicks (Vencobb-100) in Swine and A_vian
Research Program, Khumaltar of NARC; which were randomized into 4 dietary groups (Olto 04) wtth 3
replicates of each. All the groups along with their replicates were separately housed in a poultry house with
standard and identical management and environmental conditions. A commercial broiler feed (Ratna feed)
was used as basal diet (01). Other diets were prepared by mixing different herbal liver stimulants in
different dose levels in the basal diet. Birds fed with Livoliv 250@ 250 g/ton (02) attained higher body
weight ( 1903±72 g) followed by 04 i.e. Superliv @ 500 g/ton (17 I I± 16 g) and basal diet (1675±78 g) with
FCR of2.70±0.09, 2.84±0.04 and 2.83±0.06 respectively. Whereas birds under 03 (Livoliv 250@500 g/ton)
gained significantly (P<0.05) lower body weight ( 1582±23 g) with FCR of 2.81 ±0.0 l. The results clearly
indicated a negative effect of higher concentration of Livoliv 250 in feed consumption and weight gain.
Similarly, percentage mortality was recorded 1.59% and 1.64% under the diet 03 and 04 respectively.
Profit per bird over chick and feed cost was obtained higher with Livoliv 250 @250 g/ton (Rs 73.69±6.1)
followed by Superliv @ 500 g/ton (Rs 59.55± 1.9) and it was lowest under Livoliv 250 @500 g/ton (Rs
53.99±1.4). It may be concluded that supplementation of herbal liver stimulant (Livoliv 250@250g/ton) is
beneficial for improving growth. FCR, nutrient digestibility, reducing severity of liver lesions and higher
profit in broilers.

The present investigation was undertaken on 240 day-old broiler chicks (Vencobb-100) in Swine and A_vian
Research Program, Khumaltar of NARC; which were randomized into 4 dietary groups (Olto 04) wtth 3
replicates of each. All the groups along with their replicates were separately housed in a poultry house with
standard and identical management and environmental conditions. A commercial broiler feed (Ratna feed)
was used as basal diet (01). Other diets were prepared by mixing different herbal liver stimulants in
different dose levels in the basal diet. Birds fed with Livoliv 250@ 250 g/ton (02) attained higher body
weight ( 1903±72 g) followed by 04 i.e. Superliv @ 500 g/ton (17 I I± 16 g) and basal diet (1675±78 g) with
FCR of2.70±0.09, 2.84±0.04 and 2.83±0.06 respectively. Whereas birds under 03 (Livoliv 250@500 g/ton)
gained significantly (P<0.05) lower body weight ( 1582±23 g) with FCR of 2.81 ±0.0 l. The results clearly
indicated a negative effect of higher concentration of Livoliv 250 in feed consumption and weight gain.
Similarly, percentage mortality was recorded 1.59% and 1.64% under the diet 03 and 04 respectively.
Profit per bird over chick and feed cost was obtained higher with Livoliv 250 @250 g/ton (Rs 73.69±6.1)
followed by Superliv @ 500 g/ton (Rs 59.55± 1.9) and it was lowest under Livoliv 250 @500 g/ton (Rs
53.99±1.4). It may be concluded that supplementation of herbal liver stimulant (Livoliv 250@250g/ton) is
beneficial for improving growth. FCR, nutrient digestibility, reducing severity of liver lesions and higher
profit in broilers.